Friday, December 28, 2018

Strictly Ballroom - 3 stars out of 10

Strictly Ballroom - 3 stars out of 10

"Strictly Ballroom” is a goofy 90’s romantic comedy about a competitive dancer who doesn’t want to adhere to the rules.  It is okay for what it is but you shouldn’t walk into this one expecting “You’ve Got Mail.”  The tone lies somewhere between a Christopher Guest mockumentary and a Chris Farley comedy, with a love story about as strong as that of “Happy Gilmore.”  In fact, I wouldn’t even really consider this a romcom.  I really sense a cinematic identify crisis with this film.  It film focuses on exaggerated stereotypes and over-the-top acting rather than a strong plot, but they aren't quite ridiculous enough to be at a mockumentary level.  Even the dancing that is the focus of the story is only slightly better than average.  Viewing the film with these expectations, the actors get the job done by capturing the spirit of each character’s big personality.  Paul Mercurio and Tara Morice do well in the lead roles, though I preferred the character roles of Pat Thomson (mother) and Bill Hunter (Barry).  I was surprised to see Baz Luhrman’s name attached as director since the film is such a far cry from his other films like “Moulin Rouge” and “Romeo + Juliet.”  I feel like it falls short of his visionary storytelling.  He is well-known as a risk taker but perhaps he was just finding his vision since it was his directorial debut.  I view “Strictly Ballroom” as an “ok” film that feels dated; still, if you’re looking for a brief amusement and a sense of nostalgia for 90’s films, this one should do the trick.


[Pictured: Even the dance sequences can't make this a memorable film]

Tuesday, December 25, 2018

Crazy Rich Asians - 6 stars out of 10

Crazy Rich Asians - 6 stars out of 10

“Crazy Rich Asians” has risen to critical acclaim but I feel like it wasn’t much more than a standard chick flick story with a unique packaging.  I certainly didn’t hate it and would probably watch it again for Constance Wu’s performance.  The film’s predictable story makes a lot of sense through the lens of Asian culture by showing how family history factors into being a potential candidate for marriage.  Still, was the story really that far off from “Monster-in-Law”?  It’s okay for a movie to have a predictable ending but it was easy to anticipate every step of this story.  The film has a lot going for it but I still have to call it what it is: a predictable chick flick.  It will never be on the same level as a groundbreaking drama like “Silver Lining’s Playbook,” even if they score within 1% of each other on Rotten Tomatoes.  There is a little too much reliance on engaging the audience through the cool lifestyle of rich people (the same way that Disney drew 90’s kids into the theater with “Blank Check”) and the film would benefit from a stronger emphasis on its impressive actors. Awkwafina hits all of the right comedic notes and Gemma Chan contrasts the main love story by struggling through a toxic relationship.  Meanwhile, Michelle Yeoh (of “Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon” fame) rises above the rest with a powerful dramatic performance as the potential mother-in-law.  I applaud “Crazy Rich Asians” for its diverse casting and impressive acting, but I wouldn’t put it on the same level as an Oscar contender.



[Pictured: The cast is very good but the story is very predictable]