The Last Exorcism - 8 stars out of 10
Wow, that was absolutely out of control. So far out of control that I don't agree with its PG-13 rating. Even though "The Last Exorcism" passes by with virtually no language or nudity, the content and imagery are far too intense for young eyes. That being said, I really enjoyed this unpredictable film that will make you roll your eyes... and then unroll them once you realize the effective set-up for a twist. I think that the "found footage" technique is my favorite storytelling technique and this film surpasses "The Blair Witch Project" by a longshot. Nothing compares to the special effects when Nell's body is contorting with the shaky camera making it all feel so real. The film has incredible shock value as the possession scenes are long and graphic. The ending is incredible and will definitely linger on your mind for hours (or days) after viewing. Ashley Bell was so freaky and believable in every scene of possession, selling the character through the subtle acting as soft-spoken Nell. I didn't care for the fact that the main character was a hypocritical preacher. I don't believe that the "doubter regaining his faith" theme was played up enough for it to be necessary but the concept of an exorcist trying to debunk exorcism as fraud give a necessary excuse for the creation of a documentary. Despite my distaste for the preacher's situation, this film offers a fresh cinematic take on exorcism and is good for a scare, though I would categorize this as "too horrific to be a date movie."
Saturday, July 2, 2011
The Haunting In Connecticut - 4 stars out of 10
The Haunting In Connecticut - 4 stars out of 10
There isn't a tremendous amount of plot in this movie; rather, it's a series of disturbing events haunting one child. Then suddenly, they go to a library and the entire plot is revealed. Unfortunately, you sit through 50 minutes of random jumpy scenes to get there. Then you sit through another random bunch of disturbing images again and then there's an ending that re-introduces the plot and resolves it - Not exactly the greatest movie of all time. A lot of the things happening in this movie aren't scary, but there are a ridiculous number of jump scenes and you can't help but continually jump out of your skin. Because the kid is medicated, you can never be sure what is reality or illusion, and he can't be sure, either! You can feel his frustration and it also makes it possible for any horrific display imagineable to occur on screen. This movie is good for a scare (definitely a good date movie), but beyond that I wouldn't advise it.
There isn't a tremendous amount of plot in this movie; rather, it's a series of disturbing events haunting one child. Then suddenly, they go to a library and the entire plot is revealed. Unfortunately, you sit through 50 minutes of random jumpy scenes to get there. Then you sit through another random bunch of disturbing images again and then there's an ending that re-introduces the plot and resolves it - Not exactly the greatest movie of all time. A lot of the things happening in this movie aren't scary, but there are a ridiculous number of jump scenes and you can't help but continually jump out of your skin. Because the kid is medicated, you can never be sure what is reality or illusion, and he can't be sure, either! You can feel his frustration and it also makes it possible for any horrific display imagineable to occur on screen. This movie is good for a scare (definitely a good date movie), but beyond that I wouldn't advise it.
The X-Files: Fight the Future (1998) - 6 stars out of 10
The X-Files: Fight the Future (1998) - 6 stars out of 10
"The X-Files: Fight the Future" is a decent alien movie following along with the popular tv series. The movie manages to create a story that any viewer can enjoy, though there is not any character development since it is assumed that you have already developed an attachment through the show. The acting isn't superb but Duchovny and Anderson play their roles well, while Martin Landau was a smart addition to the cast. "Will you still believe" after it is over? The film has a good balance of showing the aliens (as any moviegoer would expect) while keeping a lot of mystery by not showing TOO much. I wouldn't label this as a "must-see" but if you enjoy the tv series or enjoy alien movies, it's worth your time.
"The X-Files: Fight the Future" is a decent alien movie following along with the popular tv series. The movie manages to create a story that any viewer can enjoy, though there is not any character development since it is assumed that you have already developed an attachment through the show. The acting isn't superb but Duchovny and Anderson play their roles well, while Martin Landau was a smart addition to the cast. "Will you still believe" after it is over? The film has a good balance of showing the aliens (as any moviegoer would expect) while keeping a lot of mystery by not showing TOO much. I wouldn't label this as a "must-see" but if you enjoy the tv series or enjoy alien movies, it's worth your time.
Rubber - 2 stars out of 10
Rubber - 2 stars out of 10
A movie whose protagonist is a tire with psychokinetic powers? Why not! “Rubber” is an "homage to no reason" or, as I like to think of it, and anti-film. It is a satire that shows how an audience is willing to sit through the most nonsensical story of a film as long as a production studio calls it "entertainment." As the opening monologue explains, all of the events of the movie occur for no reason. One of the more clever aspects of the film is the integration of an audience into the film. One would expect this audience to be watching the film in the theater but to emphasize the absurdity of watching this story, they are in the middle of the desert watching through binoculars. The satirical nature of the film is much easier to understand the second time around (yes, I watched this twice) but it spends too much time in the realm of “unwatchable.” There is literally no reason for any of the events that occur. Whether it is Robert (the tire who has become self aware) making things explode or the "spectators" getting sick eating turkey, the tiresome (pun intended) film is an ode to the banal. I'll admit that the first time, I had unreasonably high hopes for this film as I believed that it would be a dumb-looking concept that turned out to be wildly entertaining. I was wrong. I should also admit that the second time, I was looking forward to absorbing the deeper meaning behind it but was instead struck by how unwatchable it really is. I was just so anxious for the "Just Don't Want To Be Lonely” sequence and couldn’t believe that it took over ten minutes to get there. Some of the random moments are mildly amusing (like a tire watching NASCAR on tv) and the animation of Robert is impressive (stop motion, I'm assuming?), but it is still incredibly difficult to sit through this. Whether you are hoping for an entertaining film about a homicidal tire or an impressive commentary on the film industry, you will find neither in “Rubber.”
A movie whose protagonist is a tire with psychokinetic powers? Why not! “Rubber” is an "homage to no reason" or, as I like to think of it, and anti-film. It is a satire that shows how an audience is willing to sit through the most nonsensical story of a film as long as a production studio calls it "entertainment." As the opening monologue explains, all of the events of the movie occur for no reason. One of the more clever aspects of the film is the integration of an audience into the film. One would expect this audience to be watching the film in the theater but to emphasize the absurdity of watching this story, they are in the middle of the desert watching through binoculars. The satirical nature of the film is much easier to understand the second time around (yes, I watched this twice) but it spends too much time in the realm of “unwatchable.” There is literally no reason for any of the events that occur. Whether it is Robert (the tire who has become self aware) making things explode or the "spectators" getting sick eating turkey, the tiresome (pun intended) film is an ode to the banal. I'll admit that the first time, I had unreasonably high hopes for this film as I believed that it would be a dumb-looking concept that turned out to be wildly entertaining. I was wrong. I should also admit that the second time, I was looking forward to absorbing the deeper meaning behind it but was instead struck by how unwatchable it really is. I was just so anxious for the "Just Don't Want To Be Lonely” sequence and couldn’t believe that it took over ten minutes to get there. Some of the random moments are mildly amusing (like a tire watching NASCAR on tv) and the animation of Robert is impressive (stop motion, I'm assuming?), but it is still incredibly difficult to sit through this. Whether you are hoping for an entertaining film about a homicidal tire or an impressive commentary on the film industry, you will find neither in “Rubber.”
[Pictured: Nothing to see here, just Robert leaving destruction in his path]
Stigmata - 1 star out of 10
Stigmata - 1 star out of 10
I should have watched "Ghost Dad" instead... I'm probably the first human ever to utter those words. This movie is just bizarre. So bizarre that it only took a few minutes to tune it out and shift my focus to something else while the movie played on. There isn't much of a flow to it. It's like they were in the middle of the scene and the director said "Gee, it's been a while since the main character bled..." so they threw in some random screaming and cut-aways. I feel like this film wants to be the Exorcist but it just ends up being an offensive piece of garbage that can't rely on storyline, dialogue, logic, or acting to even qualify it as "passable." I can't see any reason to view this piece of sacrlege, unless you enjoy being bored, confused, and annoyed.
I should have watched "Ghost Dad" instead... I'm probably the first human ever to utter those words. This movie is just bizarre. So bizarre that it only took a few minutes to tune it out and shift my focus to something else while the movie played on. There isn't much of a flow to it. It's like they were in the middle of the scene and the director said "Gee, it's been a while since the main character bled..." so they threw in some random screaming and cut-aways. I feel like this film wants to be the Exorcist but it just ends up being an offensive piece of garbage that can't rely on storyline, dialogue, logic, or acting to even qualify it as "passable." I can't see any reason to view this piece of sacrlege, unless you enjoy being bored, confused, and annoyed.
Thursday, June 30, 2011
Men of Honor - 9 stars out of 10
Men of Honor - 9 stars out of 10
Wow, could this guy be anymore of a real-life last action hero? Cuba Gooding Jr. plays the victim of extreme racism as he attempts to become the Navy's first African American Master Diver. His role is emotional and fantastic as he never quits, no matter how dire the circumstances get. I had trouble believing that this was a true st...ory, even after reading multiple synopses. This very well could beat his performance in Jerry Maguire (though it'll be tough to ever rival his performance in Radio). DeNiro plays the jerk so well, making you truly want to see him find redemption. This film has a little bit of everything - action, drama, a courtroom scene, layers of emotion, and most importantly, inspiration.
It - 4 stars out of 10
It - 4 stars out of 10
While the story of "It" is pretty creepy, this 1990 version (limited to visuals appropriate for a tv miniseries) seemed much scarier when I was a kid. I really hope that this film is redone to live up to its frightening reputation. Tim Curry is great as Pennywise and the film is a decent telling of the story, but it can't compare wi...th films designed for the theater. This becomes obvious when the 175 minute build-up is interrupted by "special effects" that wouldn't have even passed in a 50's sci-fi film. The ending is an infamous disappointment and is reason enough to remake this film. As far as the story is concerned, I was surprised that there was nearly as much conflict with the bullies as with the clown. I enjoyed the duality of the film, with the children's journey to defeat Pennywise and the adults' journey to defeat him. The use of flashbacks is very effective, particularly the 5-second-or-less flashbacks when a brief memory comes back to the adults. Despite its 3+ hour run time, it doesn't feel like a long movie - there's just a lot of story to tell. I wouldn't call "It" a cinematic masterpiece but "It" is definitely worth watching to experience this story.
Mean Streets - 7 stars out of 10
Mean Streets - 7 stars out of 10
Martin Scorsese's first feature film delivers all of the grit and scum found on the streets of New York City. Unlike most films of this genre, "Mean Streets" focuses on a character who is protecting his friend from the mob instead of the family itself. With an autobiographical aspect to the film, Scorsese achieves realism by recreat...ing the atmosphere in which he was raised. The dialogue delivers everything that you would expect from an Italian stereotype to give a sense of authenticity. Robert DeNiro often receives the most praise for his portrayal of Johnny Boy, an irresponsible delinquent who is reminiscent of every jerk that you encountered in high school, knowing that they would not find any success in life. His portrayal is unpredictable and detestible, preparing your for the inevitability at the end of the film. More impressive to me is Keitel, whose role is the center of the film as he tries to protect Johnny Boy from the loan sharks (and from himself). Without question, his performance is what drives this film. Amy Robinson is also wonderful as the beautiful Teresa. Although Mean Streets cannot compete with The Godfather and GoodFellas in the realm of crime films, it provides a unique perspective into the streets of New York City and is worth watching.
Martin Scorsese's first feature film delivers all of the grit and scum found on the streets of New York City. Unlike most films of this genre, "Mean Streets" focuses on a character who is protecting his friend from the mob instead of the family itself. With an autobiographical aspect to the film, Scorsese achieves realism by recreat...ing the atmosphere in which he was raised. The dialogue delivers everything that you would expect from an Italian stereotype to give a sense of authenticity. Robert DeNiro often receives the most praise for his portrayal of Johnny Boy, an irresponsible delinquent who is reminiscent of every jerk that you encountered in high school, knowing that they would not find any success in life. His portrayal is unpredictable and detestible, preparing your for the inevitability at the end of the film. More impressive to me is Keitel, whose role is the center of the film as he tries to protect Johnny Boy from the loan sharks (and from himself). Without question, his performance is what drives this film. Amy Robinson is also wonderful as the beautiful Teresa. Although Mean Streets cannot compete with The Godfather and GoodFellas in the realm of crime films, it provides a unique perspective into the streets of New York City and is worth watching.
Tuesday, June 28, 2011
Tender Mercies - 5 stars out of 10
Tender Mercies - 5 stars out of 10
Although Robert Duvall has often played important (and impressive) supporting roles in some of the most significant films in history, "Tender Mercies" IS Robert Duvall. His performance is great and he deserved the Oscar, but I believe that he has been more deserving of an Oscar for some of his other roles. That being said, he is excellent as this mysterious drifter whose past is slowly revealed through his relationship with his new wife and old friends. His former-country-singer-persona is very believable, particularly in the scene where he is teaching his step-son about chord structure. The script is pretty good and the story delivers a rough twist. I wouldn't call this one of the best films of all time but any fan of Duvall must see his Oscar-winning performance in Tender Mercies.
Although Robert Duvall has often played important (and impressive) supporting roles in some of the most significant films in history, "Tender Mercies" IS Robert Duvall. His performance is great and he deserved the Oscar, but I believe that he has been more deserving of an Oscar for some of his other roles. That being said, he is excellent as this mysterious drifter whose past is slowly revealed through his relationship with his new wife and old friends. His former-country-singer-persona is very believable, particularly in the scene where he is teaching his step-son about chord structure. The script is pretty good and the story delivers a rough twist. I wouldn't call this one of the best films of all time but any fan of Duvall must see his Oscar-winning performance in Tender Mercies.
Without Limits - 8 stars out of 10
Without Limits - 8 stars out of 10
"Without Limits" is a beautiful homage to the life and successes of Steve Prefontaine. Crudup's news interview, which is played during the opening of the film and later in the context of the story, shows a unique contrast between the beginning of the film when the words are slightly meaningless (since we haven't met the main character) and later in the film once we have gotten to know Prefontaine and his running style. The acting is top-notch. I'm not very familiar with Billy Crudup as an actor but this film has piqued my interest. He plays the role of Prefontaine perfectly. Donald Sutherland is inspirational as his coach who would later go on to found Nike. Although Monica Potter plays a small role, her beautiful eyes leave a lasting impression. You will think that you have the film figured out but a few unexpected turns keep the story interesting. This is a great track film and will appeal to anybody interested in athletics.
"Without Limits" is a beautiful homage to the life and successes of Steve Prefontaine. Crudup's news interview, which is played during the opening of the film and later in the context of the story, shows a unique contrast between the beginning of the film when the words are slightly meaningless (since we haven't met the main character) and later in the film once we have gotten to know Prefontaine and his running style. The acting is top-notch. I'm not very familiar with Billy Crudup as an actor but this film has piqued my interest. He plays the role of Prefontaine perfectly. Donald Sutherland is inspirational as his coach who would later go on to found Nike. Although Monica Potter plays a small role, her beautiful eyes leave a lasting impression. You will think that you have the film figured out but a few unexpected turns keep the story interesting. This is a great track film and will appeal to anybody interested in athletics.
After.Life - 9 stars out of 10
After.Life - 9 stars out of 10
The body is dead but the soul is still alive... that's a crazy concept. Or IS that the concept? The deliciously ambiguous "After.Life" will not answer all of your questions about life and death but will certainly get you thinking. This cross between a horror film and a thriller, I guess we'll call it a "chiller," is very dark from ...start to finish. Neeson's performance is precise, as his character lands directly between gifted and insane, so that the audience cannot determine which he is. Christina Ricci certainly has come a long way since Casper, delivering the necessary emotions and non-emotion to believably play a corpse unable to accept her fate. Justin Long isn't my favorite but he played his role well, though this film is all about the story and not about the acting. The horrific imagery that Anna envisions will have you hoping that this film isn't a preview of what death will be like. Everybody needs to see After.Life just for the unexplained ambiguous ending... absolutely genius. A few twists will alter your perspecive back and forth but in the end, this is the ultimate "Choose Your Own Explanation" cliffhanger.
Monday, June 27, 2011
Suspiria - 4 stars out of 10
Suspiria - 4 stars out of 10
Oh, wow. What the [expletive] was that? The horrific violin screeching during the opening credits really puts you on edge and gets you ready for a horrific experience. Some people think that it's horrifically bad, others think that it's incredibly imaginative, and I'm still trying to figure out what I think. There overwhelming use... of color is very cool and what this film has become known for. The screen tints toward one color for several minutes, but you may not notice without intentionally watch for it since Dario Argento cleverly weaves it into the plot at appropriate times. Although I really enjoyed the visually artistic use of colors, the "artistic" sequences of bugs and other bizarre imagery were a bit much (almost like watching the video from The Ring). As an art piece, "Susperia" is pretty cool but I expected a lot more ballet and thought that it would've been a pretty cool setting for a scary movie. The film certainly has some shocking moments, like the entire opening sequence, and who could forget the dog... [sad face]. Suspiria is certainly a "different" film and you must prepare yourself for that, but the haunting musical motifs, unpredictability, and horrific imagery will cater to scary movie fans everywhere.
Father and Scout - 1 star out of 10
Father and Scout - 1 star out of 10
A picture says a thousand words... and you'll notice that the cover of "Father and Scout" includes Bob Saget and a bear wearing a hat. Saget made a great Danny Tanner and host for America's Funniest Home Videos, but his performance in this film often feels improvised (in a bad way). The editors allowed the scenes to last too long, s...ometimes a minute or more. Finally, Brian Bonsall is just terrible in every scene. I don't know if anybody watches this film for a reason other than mockery, but the only laughs are a result of bad acting and poor dialogue.
P.S. There isn't even a bear in this movie!!!
P.S. There isn't even a bear in this movie!!!
Cleopatra - 4 stars out of 10
Cleopatra - 4 stars out of 10
"Cleopatra" is certainly an epic film, more so because of its 4-hour running time and Hollywood infamy than anything else. It has some great moments (as one would hope in a film of this length), but it is just impractical to sit and watch. As indicated by its 4 visually-related Oscar wins, Cleopatra's main draw is its scenery and costuming. I cannot even fathom what it must have been like to watch Cleopatra’s entrance to Rome when this film premiered in 1963. "Visually stunning" would have been an understatement, though compared to today's high definition lifestyle, it falls to "impressive." Elizabeth Taylor is beautiful, adding to the visual appeal. Unfortunately, everything else about this film makes it an unlikely pick for a Friday night date movie, including average performances by good actors and its inclusion on many lists of the world's longest movies. It is a good story chronicling 18 years of Cleopatra's reign (and tragic end); unfortunately, it feels as if it takes 18 years to watch this entire film.
"Cleopatra" is certainly an epic film, more so because of its 4-hour running time and Hollywood infamy than anything else. It has some great moments (as one would hope in a film of this length), but it is just impractical to sit and watch. As indicated by its 4 visually-related Oscar wins, Cleopatra's main draw is its scenery and costuming. I cannot even fathom what it must have been like to watch Cleopatra’s entrance to Rome when this film premiered in 1963. "Visually stunning" would have been an understatement, though compared to today's high definition lifestyle, it falls to "impressive." Elizabeth Taylor is beautiful, adding to the visual appeal. Unfortunately, everything else about this film makes it an unlikely pick for a Friday night date movie, including average performances by good actors and its inclusion on many lists of the world's longest movies. It is a good story chronicling 18 years of Cleopatra's reign (and tragic end); unfortunately, it feels as if it takes 18 years to watch this entire film.
Carrie (1976) - 8 stars out of 10
Carrie (1976) - 8 stars out of 10
This movie was MESSED UP in a genius way. Although every audience member has a certain horrific expectation, the ratio of normal to abnormal makes the ending INCREDIBLY effective. The opening scene is shocking and upsetting, and then the opening interaction between Spacek and Laurie sets the audience up to understand why Carrie is the way that she is. From there, the movie displays normal high school interactions with some stereotypical characters. This movie screams "Hitchcock" from its cinematography to the high school's name (Bates) to those blood-curdling Psycho notes on the violin. My favorite part of the movie is how quickly it turns from normal to Satanic. It is a rarity for a horror film to receive an Oscar nomination (let alone 2 in acting categories) but Spacek and Laurie deliver unforgettable performances in their 2-member disfunctional family. It definitely benefitted Spacek to have the acting maturity of a 26-year-old while appearing to be a teenager. The ending is perfect and this movie simply will not disappoint. Thank you Stephen King, for your sick mind that dreamt up Carrie and will change my thoughts regarding prom forever.
This movie was MESSED UP in a genius way. Although every audience member has a certain horrific expectation, the ratio of normal to abnormal makes the ending INCREDIBLY effective. The opening scene is shocking and upsetting, and then the opening interaction between Spacek and Laurie sets the audience up to understand why Carrie is the way that she is. From there, the movie displays normal high school interactions with some stereotypical characters. This movie screams "Hitchcock" from its cinematography to the high school's name (Bates) to those blood-curdling Psycho notes on the violin. My favorite part of the movie is how quickly it turns from normal to Satanic. It is a rarity for a horror film to receive an Oscar nomination (let alone 2 in acting categories) but Spacek and Laurie deliver unforgettable performances in their 2-member disfunctional family. It definitely benefitted Spacek to have the acting maturity of a 26-year-old while appearing to be a teenager. The ending is perfect and this movie simply will not disappoint. Thank you Stephen King, for your sick mind that dreamt up Carrie and will change my thoughts regarding prom forever.
The Ladykillers (1955) - 5 stars out of 10
The Ladykillers (1955) - 5 stars out of 10
Being familiar with the Tom Hanks remake of The Ladykillers, I was really anticipating this movie since originals are so often superior. Unfortunately, this film moves pretty slowly and is not nearly as funny as I had hoped. There is a lot of standing around and talking and not much else. Alec Guinness and Katie Johnson are excellent but everybody else's acting is mediocre. If you are interested in the story of The Ladykillers, definitely go for the remake instead of the original. It'll provide you with better characters and a lot more laughs. If you are interested in great acting, Katie Johnson totally delivers in this role.
Being familiar with the Tom Hanks remake of The Ladykillers, I was really anticipating this movie since originals are so often superior. Unfortunately, this film moves pretty slowly and is not nearly as funny as I had hoped. There is a lot of standing around and talking and not much else. Alec Guinness and Katie Johnson are excellent but everybody else's acting is mediocre. If you are interested in the story of The Ladykillers, definitely go for the remake instead of the original. It'll provide you with better characters and a lot more laughs. If you are interested in great acting, Katie Johnson totally delivers in this role.
Foreign Correspondent - 7 stars out of 10
Foreign Correspondent - 7 stars out of 10
It isn't Hitchcock's best, but it is still Hitchcock! This film offers some classic moments, like the alternating windmill and the church tower scene. Decent acting, excellent vision from Hitchcock (which is obvious in the creative cinematography), and a few huge surprises makes Foreign Correspondent worth watching.
It isn't Hitchcock's best, but it is still Hitchcock! This film offers some classic moments, like the alternating windmill and the church tower scene. Decent acting, excellent vision from Hitchcock (which is obvious in the creative cinematography), and a few huge surprises makes Foreign Correspondent worth watching.
Dragnet - 3 stars out of 10
Dragnet - 3 stars out of 10
Eh... I like Tom Hanks in most things but found Dan Aykroyd to be less-than charming. The story was alright but the acting was nothing special. It was very obvious to me that I was watching a comedy (in a bad way).
Eh... I like Tom Hanks in most things but found Dan Aykroyd to be less-than charming. The story was alright but the acting was nothing special. It was very obvious to me that I was watching a comedy (in a bad way).
A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010) - 8 stars out of 10
A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010) - 8 stars out of 10
Amidst the overwhelming barrage of recent remakes of classic horror films, this is definitely the best. Obviously it cannot match the original (which has become one of the ultimate classics of the horror genre and a standard against which all other horror movies are measured), but it is a very effective retelling of the original. The special effects are awesome but more than anything, this remake helped me to appreciate Wes Craven's amazing special effects in 1984. The original special effects were actually more effective for me than the incredibly realistic CGI in this film. The original Freddy was better, hands down. There really is no comparison to Robert Englund, although I found that the reimagining of Freddy as a child molester made him incredibly creepy. He's still scary but he accomplishes true creepiness whereas the original Krueger was just scary. I was also impressed by the quality of actors casted for this horror film, particularly Jackie Earle Haley, Katie Cassidy, and Thomas Dekker. I hope that "Nightmare" fans will give this film a shot instead of immediately writing it off because it is a remake.
Amidst the overwhelming barrage of recent remakes of classic horror films, this is definitely the best. Obviously it cannot match the original (which has become one of the ultimate classics of the horror genre and a standard against which all other horror movies are measured), but it is a very effective retelling of the original. The special effects are awesome but more than anything, this remake helped me to appreciate Wes Craven's amazing special effects in 1984. The original special effects were actually more effective for me than the incredibly realistic CGI in this film. The original Freddy was better, hands down. There really is no comparison to Robert Englund, although I found that the reimagining of Freddy as a child molester made him incredibly creepy. He's still scary but he accomplishes true creepiness whereas the original Krueger was just scary. I was also impressed by the quality of actors casted for this horror film, particularly Jackie Earle Haley, Katie Cassidy, and Thomas Dekker. I hope that "Nightmare" fans will give this film a shot instead of immediately writing it off because it is a remake.
True Romance - 9 stars out of 10
True Romance - 9 stars out of 10
Classic cinema meets an all-star cast in this crime film written by Quentin Tarantino. Patricia Arquette is absolutely adorable and is the perfect counterpart to Slater in this cute-love-story-meets-Tarantino-blood-bath action film. Oldman, Walken, Jackson, Hopper, Penn, Sizemore, Pitt, Kilmer, Gandolfini - need I say more? You never know which enormous Hollywood name will show up next as Oldman and Hopper give a few of their greatest performances, not to mention a score composed by Hans Zimmer! The story delivers emotion and intrigue as it all builds toward the incredible climactic ending. Any fan of Tarantino will love this film.
Classic cinema meets an all-star cast in this crime film written by Quentin Tarantino. Patricia Arquette is absolutely adorable and is the perfect counterpart to Slater in this cute-love-story-meets-Tarantino-blood-bath action film. Oldman, Walken, Jackson, Hopper, Penn, Sizemore, Pitt, Kilmer, Gandolfini - need I say more? You never know which enormous Hollywood name will show up next as Oldman and Hopper give a few of their greatest performances, not to mention a score composed by Hans Zimmer! The story delivers emotion and intrigue as it all builds toward the incredible climactic ending. Any fan of Tarantino will love this film.
The Goods: Live Hard, Sell Hard - 1 star out of 10
The Goods: Live Hard, Sell Hard - 1 star out of 10
It's pretty much what you expect, except not funny. It has a few decent moments but basically, it's as dirty as The Hangover without any of the humor. I'd recommend it if you're a die-hard Ving Rhames fan, but other than his funny moments, this film just doesn't offer much.
It's pretty much what you expect, except not funny. It has a few decent moments but basically, it's as dirty as The Hangover without any of the humor. I'd recommend it if you're a die-hard Ving Rhames fan, but other than his funny moments, this film just doesn't offer much.
The Rocky Horror Picture Show - 5 stars out of 10
The Rocky Horror Picture Show - 5 stars out of 10
This movie is... interesting... Curry's performance falls somewhere between genius and madness. The music was great and I can definitely see how this became a cult classic, but it is definitely not my cup of tea. But for all of the bizarre imagery presented in this film, I can't help but LOVE The Time Warp! I'll never look at Susan Sarandon in the same way, and Tim Curry's amazing performance is probably the only real reason to watch this (aside from The Time Warp, of course).
This movie is... interesting... Curry's performance falls somewhere between genius and madness. The music was great and I can definitely see how this became a cult classic, but it is definitely not my cup of tea. But for all of the bizarre imagery presented in this film, I can't help but LOVE The Time Warp! I'll never look at Susan Sarandon in the same way, and Tim Curry's amazing performance is probably the only real reason to watch this (aside from The Time Warp, of course).
Noises Off... - 10 stars out of 10
Noises Off... - 10 stars out of 10
A cast full of stars cannot shine much brighter than this one. In a hilarious story that depends just as much on visual timing as it does on quirky characters, this cast creates mayhem like it's their job (literally and figuratively). Each character is so dynamically different from the next that it's like a visual circus. Michael Caine is perfect at portraying the frustration of a director whose show falls apart in front of his eyes. Denholm Elliott appears in his greatest role (even better than Marcus Brody in Indiana Jones) and delivers each line with hilarity. Henner and Sheridan are beautiful and dynamically deliver their opposite roles, particularly Sheridan's clueless moments toward the beginning. Reeve, Hagerty, and Baker all bring life to their characters as Carol Burnett is as ridiculous as ever, switching between accents at exactly the right moments. And the best of all is John Ritter, who masterfully delivers every line without finishing a sentence. The timing of his line delivery is more important than anybody else's and he nailed it. I don't know how this film did not win any awards, especially for best cinematography during the rehearsal scene as it quickly follows the action occuring at each door on both levels. Also, the timing is absolute perfection as the characters grab things from each others' hands and pass them off to the next person without the camera ever cutting away. This movie will have you in stitches and if you haven't seen it before, it needs to jump to the top of your list A.S.A.P.
A cast full of stars cannot shine much brighter than this one. In a hilarious story that depends just as much on visual timing as it does on quirky characters, this cast creates mayhem like it's their job (literally and figuratively). Each character is so dynamically different from the next that it's like a visual circus. Michael Caine is perfect at portraying the frustration of a director whose show falls apart in front of his eyes. Denholm Elliott appears in his greatest role (even better than Marcus Brody in Indiana Jones) and delivers each line with hilarity. Henner and Sheridan are beautiful and dynamically deliver their opposite roles, particularly Sheridan's clueless moments toward the beginning. Reeve, Hagerty, and Baker all bring life to their characters as Carol Burnett is as ridiculous as ever, switching between accents at exactly the right moments. And the best of all is John Ritter, who masterfully delivers every line without finishing a sentence. The timing of his line delivery is more important than anybody else's and he nailed it. I don't know how this film did not win any awards, especially for best cinematography during the rehearsal scene as it quickly follows the action occuring at each door on both levels. Also, the timing is absolute perfection as the characters grab things from each others' hands and pass them off to the next person without the camera ever cutting away. This movie will have you in stitches and if you haven't seen it before, it needs to jump to the top of your list A.S.A.P.
Toy Story 3 - 10 stars out of 10
Toy Story 3 - 10 stars out of 10
Pixar concludes the Toy Story trilogy with its finest offering yet. Hysterical visual gags and one-liners set Toy Story 3 above its two predecessors. But this movie is intended more for the generation that first discovered it 15 years ago than for kids today. This story is slightly dark (emphasis on slightly) as it tells a sad tale of seperation and growing up. The theme of Andy going away to college will tug at the heartstrings of parents and Andy's interactions with his toys will really get to young adults and college students as this movie focuses in on growing up and leaving childhood behind. The animation is absolutely top notch, particularly during a few moments toward the end (which I will not spoil). I will never understand how the animators can create so much emotions in the eyes of a toy, but they absolutely nailed it. It is amazing to compare the animation of humans in the first Toy Story (which wrote the book on the computer animation) and the realism of characters like Andy's mom and the custodian. I could spend hours giving specific compliments to the incredible vocal talent of the actors from the previous films. But I will limit myself to stating that the addition of Ned Beatty (as Lotso), Michael Keaton (as Ken), Whoopi Goldberg (as the octopus), and former James Bond star Timothy Dalton as a Shakespeare-quoting porcupine was an amazing casting decision. I love that John Morris provided the voice for Andy in all three films, to provide a truly realistic effect of how our generation grew into adults with this movie, just as Andy's voice matured as his character grew older. This film is more than just another Pixar film - it is a statement about growing up and childhood. The themes of this film probably go over the heads of every child that sees it, but I won't deny that I had tears streaming down my cheeks for 10 straight minutes at the end.
Pixar concludes the Toy Story trilogy with its finest offering yet. Hysterical visual gags and one-liners set Toy Story 3 above its two predecessors. But this movie is intended more for the generation that first discovered it 15 years ago than for kids today. This story is slightly dark (emphasis on slightly) as it tells a sad tale of seperation and growing up. The theme of Andy going away to college will tug at the heartstrings of parents and Andy's interactions with his toys will really get to young adults and college students as this movie focuses in on growing up and leaving childhood behind. The animation is absolutely top notch, particularly during a few moments toward the end (which I will not spoil). I will never understand how the animators can create so much emotions in the eyes of a toy, but they absolutely nailed it. It is amazing to compare the animation of humans in the first Toy Story (which wrote the book on the computer animation) and the realism of characters like Andy's mom and the custodian. I could spend hours giving specific compliments to the incredible vocal talent of the actors from the previous films. But I will limit myself to stating that the addition of Ned Beatty (as Lotso), Michael Keaton (as Ken), Whoopi Goldberg (as the octopus), and former James Bond star Timothy Dalton as a Shakespeare-quoting porcupine was an amazing casting decision. I love that John Morris provided the voice for Andy in all three films, to provide a truly realistic effect of how our generation grew into adults with this movie, just as Andy's voice matured as his character grew older. This film is more than just another Pixar film - it is a statement about growing up and childhood. The themes of this film probably go over the heads of every child that sees it, but I won't deny that I had tears streaming down my cheeks for 10 straight minutes at the end.
Despicable Me - 9 stars out of 10
Despicable Me - 9 stars out of 10
It may not have a story line that can compare to Pixar films, but the visual gags of "Despicable Me" elevate it to a computer-animated level just short of Pixar. For me, many of the gags were reminiscent of Looney Toons and as a result, this movie made me feel like a kid. Steve Carell's accent as Gru is a wonderful achievement for the versatile actor as he drives this film from start to finish. The casting of the little girls was perfect. The voice acting was wonderful and emotional, and the animators reached perfection in creating the most adorable little girl in computer animation history with Agnes. Who could resist those big eyes? I love Kristen Wiig as Miss Hattie, casting Jack McBrayer as the carnival barker was a great treat for 30 Rock fans (not to mention that it was perfect for the part), and it was wonderful to hear Julie Andrews' voice as Gru's mom. I enjoyed the creativity that was woven throughout the film, from Gru's car to Vector's house to some of the weapons (SQUID LAUNCHER!) to the Minions. It isn't Pixar, but it's great for a bunch of laughs and a few tears as those three little girls warm your heart (and his).
It may not have a story line that can compare to Pixar films, but the visual gags of "Despicable Me" elevate it to a computer-animated level just short of Pixar. For me, many of the gags were reminiscent of Looney Toons and as a result, this movie made me feel like a kid. Steve Carell's accent as Gru is a wonderful achievement for the versatile actor as he drives this film from start to finish. The casting of the little girls was perfect. The voice acting was wonderful and emotional, and the animators reached perfection in creating the most adorable little girl in computer animation history with Agnes. Who could resist those big eyes? I love Kristen Wiig as Miss Hattie, casting Jack McBrayer as the carnival barker was a great treat for 30 Rock fans (not to mention that it was perfect for the part), and it was wonderful to hear Julie Andrews' voice as Gru's mom. I enjoyed the creativity that was woven throughout the film, from Gru's car to Vector's house to some of the weapons (SQUID LAUNCHER!) to the Minions. It isn't Pixar, but it's great for a bunch of laughs and a few tears as those three little girls warm your heart (and his).
Bride Wars - 4 stars out of 10
Bride Wars - 4 stars out of 10
"Bride Wars" is a cute comedy with a few laughs but not much substance. I do enjoy watching both Hathaway and Hudson and feel that both have talent and played their comedic roles well. I felt that Kristen Johnston stole the spotlight a bit (just as her character claims is always the case) and found myself anticipating her presence in each scene. I also loved Candice Bergen's voiceovers and felt that it tied the story together well. That being said... I could not understand the casting of the male characters in this film - most of them were just AWFUL! The combination of those male actors and the weak story made parts seem very amateurish. It's good for a few laughs if you have it on in the background but I'm glad that I didn't pay to see it in the theater.
"Bride Wars" is a cute comedy with a few laughs but not much substance. I do enjoy watching both Hathaway and Hudson and feel that both have talent and played their comedic roles well. I felt that Kristen Johnston stole the spotlight a bit (just as her character claims is always the case) and found myself anticipating her presence in each scene. I also loved Candice Bergen's voiceovers and felt that it tied the story together well. That being said... I could not understand the casting of the male characters in this film - most of them were just AWFUL! The combination of those male actors and the weak story made parts seem very amateurish. It's good for a few laughs if you have it on in the background but I'm glad that I didn't pay to see it in the theater.
Starship Troopers - 2 stars out of 10
Starship Troopers - 2 stars out of 10
"Starship Troopers" is a lot of decent bug-explosion special effects with nothing of quality to pull them together. The story is okay but the dialogue and acting gives an overarching sensation of "who cares?" There was about as much attraction between the lead characters as there is between oil and water. While the special effects are realistic (CGI bugs as well as gore), they just made it apparent that the actors had less depth than the computer generated bugs. There are a lot of action films and a lot of sci-fi films better than this one - this one isn't really a necessity.
"Starship Troopers" is a lot of decent bug-explosion special effects with nothing of quality to pull them together. The story is okay but the dialogue and acting gives an overarching sensation of "who cares?" There was about as much attraction between the lead characters as there is between oil and water. While the special effects are realistic (CGI bugs as well as gore), they just made it apparent that the actors had less depth than the computer generated bugs. There are a lot of action films and a lot of sci-fi films better than this one - this one isn't really a necessity.
Rashomon (In the Woods) - 3 stars out of 10
Rashomon (In the Woods) - 3 stars out of 10
The synopsis sounded awesome. The film was mediocre. A series of contradictory stories from the perspectives of witnesses reveals the details of a rape/murder while the viewer tries to decide what is true and what is false. Conceptually, it is great and inspired many films to use this technique, my favorite of which is "Clue." Unlike its modern equivalents, "Rashomon" never confirms which version of the story (if any) is true. Unfortunately, this film lacks in the acting category. Every time that the Bandit laughs, I just wanted to slap him. The film got better as the film progressed, delivering about 40 minutes of entertainment. Unfortunately, it drops off again during the final battle scene. I understand that it's making a statement of how different the characters are from the Woodcutter's perspective, but it was annoying to watch a few Japanese guys keep falling on the ground for 15 minutes. It's an historical piece but I'd rather watch a modern film that also uses the multiple-perspective concept.
The synopsis sounded awesome. The film was mediocre. A series of contradictory stories from the perspectives of witnesses reveals the details of a rape/murder while the viewer tries to decide what is true and what is false. Conceptually, it is great and inspired many films to use this technique, my favorite of which is "Clue." Unlike its modern equivalents, "Rashomon" never confirms which version of the story (if any) is true. Unfortunately, this film lacks in the acting category. Every time that the Bandit laughs, I just wanted to slap him. The film got better as the film progressed, delivering about 40 minutes of entertainment. Unfortunately, it drops off again during the final battle scene. I understand that it's making a statement of how different the characters are from the Woodcutter's perspective, but it was annoying to watch a few Japanese guys keep falling on the ground for 15 minutes. It's an historical piece but I'd rather watch a modern film that also uses the multiple-perspective concept.
Reversal of Fortune - 6 stars out of 10
Reversal of Fortune - 6 stars out of 10
Despite its title constantly making me think of "Wheel of Fortune," this film has nothing to do with a wheel and everything to do with and interesting true court case. Although Jeremy Irons deservedly won an Oscar for his dastardly performance, this film is all about Ron Silver. His portrayal of Alan Dershowitz is the single source of momentum in the film. Although Glenn Close is a great actress, this is one of the stalest performances that I have seen from her. What do you expect from an actress playing a vegetable? If you have a poor impression of her after this film, just watch Fatal Attraction. This story would be impressive if it was fiction, but the fact that this was a real court case makes it incredible. Despite it's excellent dialogue, the film does drag at points but it's worth it to see the case come together. The highlight of the film is definitely when Jeremy Irons, with the exact inflection as Scar, says ?u have no idea?verbatim from The Lion King. I wouldn't put it in my Top 100, but "Reversal of Fortune" is definitely an interesting historical court case brought to life on the screen.
Despite its title constantly making me think of "Wheel of Fortune," this film has nothing to do with a wheel and everything to do with and interesting true court case. Although Jeremy Irons deservedly won an Oscar for his dastardly performance, this film is all about Ron Silver. His portrayal of Alan Dershowitz is the single source of momentum in the film. Although Glenn Close is a great actress, this is one of the stalest performances that I have seen from her. What do you expect from an actress playing a vegetable? If you have a poor impression of her after this film, just watch Fatal Attraction. This story would be impressive if it was fiction, but the fact that this was a real court case makes it incredible. Despite it's excellent dialogue, the film does drag at points but it's worth it to see the case come together. The highlight of the film is definitely when Jeremy Irons, with the exact inflection as Scar, says ?u have no idea?verbatim from The Lion King. I wouldn't put it in my Top 100, but "Reversal of Fortune" is definitely an interesting historical court case brought to life on the screen.
Sunshine Cleaning - 3 stars out of 10
Sunshine Cleaning - 3 stars out of 10
I probably should've loved this movie but I didn't. Amy Adams is wonderful, but when it comes down to it I just can't get into dark comedies. I was actually very interested by the plot but I just did not find it entertaining and, compared to the dynamic characters of "Little Miss Sunshine," these fell flat. I didn't really latch onto the kid and I feel like that would've probably helped me to feel a connection to the characters. I can think of better ways to spend my time than by watching this movie but in the end, at least I had a chance to watch Amy Adams further diversify her acting career in another unique role.
I probably should've loved this movie but I didn't. Amy Adams is wonderful, but when it comes down to it I just can't get into dark comedies. I was actually very interested by the plot but I just did not find it entertaining and, compared to the dynamic characters of "Little Miss Sunshine," these fell flat. I didn't really latch onto the kid and I feel like that would've probably helped me to feel a connection to the characters. I can think of better ways to spend my time than by watching this movie but in the end, at least I had a chance to watch Amy Adams further diversify her acting career in another unique role.
Street Smart - 6 stars out of 10
Street Smart - 6 stars out of 10
"Street Smart" provides insight into the world of pimps and prostitutes; unfortunately, I didn't really want this much insight into prostitution. I must laud Morgan Freeman for his Oscar-nominated role, as his bi-polarity between friendliness and cruelty was unnerving. He was great, though I prefer his roles in Driving Miss Daisy, Shawshank, Batman, or just about any other film over this one. Christopher Reeve was just okay while Kathy Baker stole the show as the prostitute Punchy, particularly during the chiling threat scene ("which eye?") with Freeman. While the concept of a fictional article that resembles real-life events was interesting, the thought to use the concept on a story about a pimp was a mistake.
"Street Smart" provides insight into the world of pimps and prostitutes; unfortunately, I didn't really want this much insight into prostitution. I must laud Morgan Freeman for his Oscar-nominated role, as his bi-polarity between friendliness and cruelty was unnerving. He was great, though I prefer his roles in Driving Miss Daisy, Shawshank, Batman, or just about any other film over this one. Christopher Reeve was just okay while Kathy Baker stole the show as the prostitute Punchy, particularly during the chiling threat scene ("which eye?") with Freeman. While the concept of a fictional article that resembles real-life events was interesting, the thought to use the concept on a story about a pimp was a mistake.
Ladrón Que Roba A Ladrón (To Rob a Thief) - 8 stars out of 10
Ladrón Que Roba A Ladrón (To Rob a Thief) - 8 stars out of 10
"Ladrón Que Roba A Ladrón" (To Rob a Thief) is an excellent heist movie that is appropriately performed in Spanish. Although the film takes place in the United States, the main characters are immigrants and the heist victim is a Latin American who has taken advantage of other Latinos through infomercials on a Spanish-speaking television network. The dialogue is easy to follow, the story avoids plotholes, and the twists are very clever. The best part of the film come from the actors. Stunning performances by Colunga, Varoni, and Lisazo as the protagonists and antagonist (respectively) give the film life while Ivonne Montero is aided by her character's feisty personality to leave a very memorable impression. Julie Gonzalo surprised me, as I am so used to her English-speaking roles. The writers did a great job of creating quirky characters in the crew that played well off of each other (Torre as the buffoon actor was great) and I'd watch this film again just for the comedic chemistry in the group. This is one of the better Spanish-speaking films that I have seen and if you like heist movies, this is one of the few that can compare with "Ocean's Eleven" and "The Italian Job".
"Ladrón Que Roba A Ladrón" (To Rob a Thief) is an excellent heist movie that is appropriately performed in Spanish. Although the film takes place in the United States, the main characters are immigrants and the heist victim is a Latin American who has taken advantage of other Latinos through infomercials on a Spanish-speaking television network. The dialogue is easy to follow, the story avoids plotholes, and the twists are very clever. The best part of the film come from the actors. Stunning performances by Colunga, Varoni, and Lisazo as the protagonists and antagonist (respectively) give the film life while Ivonne Montero is aided by her character's feisty personality to leave a very memorable impression. Julie Gonzalo surprised me, as I am so used to her English-speaking roles. The writers did a great job of creating quirky characters in the crew that played well off of each other (Torre as the buffoon actor was great) and I'd watch this film again just for the comedic chemistry in the group. This is one of the better Spanish-speaking films that I have seen and if you like heist movies, this is one of the few that can compare with "Ocean's Eleven" and "The Italian Job".
Sunday, June 26, 2011
Super 8 - 9 stars out of 10
Super 8 - 9 stars out of 10
This unique mystery from J.J. Abrams did everything right and very few things wrong. Setting itself apart from Cloverfield, "Super 8" blends action and drama with comedy to make for an entertaining experience. The comedy sometimes interrupts a serious moment for a lighthearted feel but is always appropriately timed, never ruining the overall mood of the film. I had my doubts about Elle Fanning, even after her first few scenes of the movie, but once she started to cry it became immediately apparent that a new star has been born. It was very smart to use a basically unknown cast for this period piece, giving it a historical and believable feel. It would have lost the effect with a well-known celebrity in all of the scenes. I thought that the child actors were incredible (giving the film a Goonies feel with more believable acting). Joel Courtney and Fanning provided the dramatic moments while Ryan Lee and Riley Griffiths were absolutely hilarious. The action is incredible, particularly the train crash sequence. That sequence seems to last for an adrenaline-packed eternity. There was a good balance of jump scenes with pure action scenes and, though you really have to suspend your disbelief for aspects of the ending, it was a nice blend of action and emotion. I think that any cinematic resemblances to E.T. (particularly the end) were completely intentional from Spielberg. My only complaint is that the "mystery" receives way too much screen time, particularly in the cave. The novelty of Cloverfield is that, in Hitchcockian style, you only see the monster for a split second at a time and your imagination fills in all of the gaps. The same strategy would have been incredibly effective here (and was for the first 80 minutes of the movie), but the impressive CGI should have been edited out at the last minute in lieu of the mystery. I'd rather see too little and be kept wondering than to see too much and wish I hadn't. I personally did not like this movie as much as Cloverfield (and I shouldn't compare them so much), but I think that it's a great story with great characters and some stunning special effects that will thrill the first, second, and fifteenth time viewing this film.
This unique mystery from J.J. Abrams did everything right and very few things wrong. Setting itself apart from Cloverfield, "Super 8" blends action and drama with comedy to make for an entertaining experience. The comedy sometimes interrupts a serious moment for a lighthearted feel but is always appropriately timed, never ruining the overall mood of the film. I had my doubts about Elle Fanning, even after her first few scenes of the movie, but once she started to cry it became immediately apparent that a new star has been born. It was very smart to use a basically unknown cast for this period piece, giving it a historical and believable feel. It would have lost the effect with a well-known celebrity in all of the scenes. I thought that the child actors were incredible (giving the film a Goonies feel with more believable acting). Joel Courtney and Fanning provided the dramatic moments while Ryan Lee and Riley Griffiths were absolutely hilarious. The action is incredible, particularly the train crash sequence. That sequence seems to last for an adrenaline-packed eternity. There was a good balance of jump scenes with pure action scenes and, though you really have to suspend your disbelief for aspects of the ending, it was a nice blend of action and emotion. I think that any cinematic resemblances to E.T. (particularly the end) were completely intentional from Spielberg. My only complaint is that the "mystery" receives way too much screen time, particularly in the cave. The novelty of Cloverfield is that, in Hitchcockian style, you only see the monster for a split second at a time and your imagination fills in all of the gaps. The same strategy would have been incredibly effective here (and was for the first 80 minutes of the movie), but the impressive CGI should have been edited out at the last minute in lieu of the mystery. I'd rather see too little and be kept wondering than to see too much and wish I hadn't. I personally did not like this movie as much as Cloverfield (and I shouldn't compare them so much), but I think that it's a great story with great characters and some stunning special effects that will thrill the first, second, and fifteenth time viewing this film.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)